Term Limits Petition Rejected by Arlington Heights Electoral Board

Election board sides with objector of petition to place a term limits referendum for Arlington Heights voters to consider in the April election.

A referendum petition on term limits for Arlington Heights elected village officials was rejected Monday morning by the village election board. 

The decision came down after testimony was provided by the petition objector, Thomas Krausmann, and Bill Gnech who filed the petition signed by more than 2,700 Arlington Heights voters.

The election board, comprised of Mayor Arlene Mulder, Village Trustee Thomas Hayes and Village Clerk Becky Hume, heard testimony from both men, before the vote was taken. 

In his objection, Krausmann cited three issues with the referendum petition, which included that it was not stated in the form of a question, that a definitive description of who the term limits explicity applied to was not provided and a date was not included as far as when term limits would be made effective, or if they would be retroactive. 

"This is a very important question for our village, I have no problem with it going to the people," said Hayes. "What needs to happen is that the question needs to be very clear as to what individuals are voting on."

Village Attorney Jack Siegel said another issue was that the petition stated it would be a binding referendum, but subsequent communications from Gnech's lawyer indiciated he was requesting an advisory referendum. 

"It has to be a binding referendum if it deals with the mayor and the village board, Illinois Election Code requires that of home-rule municipalities such as Arlington Heights," Siegel said.  

More than 25 people attended the hearing in the village board room Monday morning. 

Two residents, both in support of the petition, spoke on Gnech's behalf.

"I signed the petition, I understood it fully. People should have the chance to vote on this, you can shut it down on a technicality, but it is something residents should be able to vote on," said Jim Elgas, Arlington Heights resident. 

"I observed Mr. Gnech getting these petitions signed, I did not see anyone have a question about what was being asked of them," said Arthur Ellingsen, Arlington Heights resident.

Ellingsen did object, however, to Hayes sitting on the election board, due to the matter being a potential conflict of interest for him.

Hayes has served on the village board as a trustee for 22 years, and the referendum question asked that there be a limit of two terms, or eights years in office.

"I was concerned about my conflict of interest due to my candidacy for mayor, and inquired about recusing myself," Hayes said. "I was told and advised that anyone on the village board would have a conflict, all board members would be affected either now or down the road."

Gnech said though he was disappointed with the decision, he plans to work to get another referendum on the ballot for term limits on the ballot for the 2014 governor's race.

What do you think about the election board's decision? Share your thoughts in our comment section below. 

Rich January 16, 2013 at 02:15 AM
I would liketo hear from someone running for MAYOR on their opinion of 8 year total trem on board & 8 year total for MAYOR. Also if your a police officer of fireman you should live in the village. People do not understand how many PERKS these jobs get.
Curt Renz January 16, 2013 at 02:48 AM
Rich wrote: "Also if your a police officer of fireman you should live in the village. People do not understand how many PERKS these jobs get." That’s because village employees are the ones who turn out to vote during municipal elections. Most other citizens do not. Those in office understand that.
Highland January 16, 2013 at 04:02 AM
Hey Vix, you can go to Mark's site and email him from there. I'm sure he'd appreciate your help for his grassroots campaign. MarkHellner4Mayor.com
Curt Renz January 16, 2013 at 05:59 AM
As mentioned earlier, when I ran for public office last year the opposing party objected. The Cook County Clerk’s board overruled the objection. None of the board members had a vested interest in the November ballot submitted to voters in the Arlington Heights/Mount Prospect area. If the Arlington Heights Village Board will not pass a bill desired by citizens, those citizens can petition for a public referendum. Then amazingly - board members unwilling to even consider potential law are the ones who determine whether the referendum will be submitted to the voters. In this case we are talking about a proposal directly affecting the board members. It’s against all democratic principles for the election board to be comprised as it is. Objections of this sort should be handled by the Cook County Clerk’s office. It has long demonstrated a willingness to go overboard to insure that as many candidates and issues as possible are presented to the voters.
Susan March 19, 2013 at 08:11 PM
Hayes has no idea how the people he has represented for sooo long feel about issues like this. What honest person would turn away thousands of signatures from his own constituents?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »